DIAGNOSTIC : DIFFÉRENDS ? CIEL ! Le discours analytique à l'épreuve de l'homonymie. : « Quelle peut être la teneur du discours psychanalytique en 2014 ? »

Abstract : This article, which can be read by non-psychoanalysts, intends to browse in four stages through the issue offered to our thinking : two (odd-numbered) stages analyzing the argument that provides its context, and two (even-numbered) of propositions presenting our views on what could be the content of the analytic discourse in the coming years. After this introduction, a first reading will point by point but informally review the argument of J.-P. Journet by showing that each of its clauses may generate a “bifurcated” comment able to serve or go against the analytic discourse. Hence the interest of the “differential diagnosis” mentioned in our title (french : DIAGNOSTIC DIFFÉRENTIEL), which makes glimpse the traps that the HOMONYMY may set to this speech. Then, to prepare a second scan which sticks neither to the analytical doxa, nor to the even authoritative opinions of our tenors and seniors, it will be proposed two attempts at redefinitions (“APOPHATIC” and “RECURSIVE”) of what psychoanalysis is, as well as methodological tools operating downstream from these redefinitions to thwart the obstacles of “external” and “internal” homonymy (starting from a syllogism which can make consensus). The third stage will precisely be made of our second scan of the issue, whose elements will be reviewed and analyzed more methodically : “external differential diagnosis” between the analytic discourse and psychology, philosophy, sociology, and modern science, and “internal differential diagnosis” on the entanglement between theoretical advances of psychoanalysts and the repeated survival of fantasmatic elements... Finally, a fourth part will present propositions and perspectives resulting from these analysis (principle of economy as to the source of psychoanalytical theorizations; dialogue with the other fields, but without compromising; specific relations with the discourse of science), all this leading to an invitation, beyond disputes (french : DIFFÉRENDS), to renew the content of the analytic discourse on some points...
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-univ-diderot.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01101923
Contributor : Jean-Jacques Pinto <>
Submitted on : Thursday, June 15, 2017 - 8:58:17 AM
Last modification on : Monday, July 2, 2018 - 2:45:59 PM
Long-term archiving on : Tuesday, December 12, 2017 - 1:06:15 PM

File

Diagnostic-Différends?Ciel.pdf
Explicit agreement for this submission

Licence


Copyright

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01101923, version 1

Citation

Jean-Jacques Pinto. DIAGNOSTIC : DIFFÉRENDS ? CIEL ! Le discours analytique à l'épreuve de l'homonymie. : « Quelle peut être la teneur du discours psychanalytique en 2014 ? ». Ouvertures, Association Ouvertures, 2014, 2, pp.5-40. ⟨hal-01101923⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

472

Files downloads

536